Hudson River Blog

Created by a sophomore seminar at Hamilton College, this blog considers the past, present, and future of the Hudson River, once described by Robert Boyle as "the most beautiful, messed up, productive, ignored, and surprising piece of water on the face of the earth."

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Native Americans on the Hudson

It is interesting to read T.C. Boyle’s World’s End, in the first few pages he mentions two Native American tribes that lived in the vicinity of the Hudson River. I was not sure if the tribes he mentioned were historically accurate so I searched and found the Kitchawank to be a subdivision of one of the main four tribes living near the Hudson. They were located in the northern part of Westchester County beyond Croton River and between Hudson River and the Connecticut. Another interesting truth that Boyle includes in his novel is that the tribe we today call the Mohawk, meaning ‘man-eaters’, called themselves, Kaniengehaga, 'people of the place of the flint’.
On the Hudson there were a number of tribes from which all sub-tribes, like that of the Kitchawank branched from. First the Mahican, ‘wolf’, tribe stretched on both sides of the Hudson from New York City all the way to Lake Champlain. When the Dutch arrived in the area this tribe was know as the ‘River Indians’. Another notable tribe was the Manhattan tribe, a tribe from the Wappinger confederacy, from whom Peter Minuit purchased Manhattan Island. Many more tribes stretch along the Hudson River and into the Mohawk Valley.
I am part of the History and Culture section of our presentation. It was interesting reading the first few pages of Boyle’s book and realizing when we split up the history we failed to include the history of the Native Americans who lived in the area. Even in class we started with Henry Hudson and his discovery of the Hudson. We never covered the Native American history of tribes who had been thriving long before the Hudson was ‘discovered’. In Shorto’s, The Island at the Center of the World, we were reminded of the Dutch influence on the Hudson Valley, but what about the Native American influence? Is their contribution to our culture solely seen in the names of the Finger Lakes or is there a stronger connection between their lives and our history?

Source: http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/index.htm

5 Comments:

Blogger TJE said...

Jane, you raise an important issue. Native American history on the Hudson may be understudied. Vassar Professor Lucy Johnson has been doing archeological work at Dennings Point in Beacon. Its history goes from the Native Americans to the enclave of a wealthy family to a brick factory and now to the new home of the Beacon Institute. We'll vist on May 1. Here's link:

http://environmentalconsortium.org/members/feature/feature.htm

10:36 AM  
Blogger TJE said...

PS. Here's link for Beacon Institute

http://www.thebeaconinstitute.org/home/

10:37 AM  
Blogger Amy Rumack said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

11:30 PM  
Blogger Amy Rumack said...

I agree that you raise a very interesting point, Jane. I remember in grade school spending a unit learning about the Iroquois and Algonquin nations, two competing nations in New York state. One tribe lived in long houses, another lived in round houses; I don’t remember which tribe lived in which. And that is about all I remember, after having covered American history in all grades but 5th and 12th.

I think that there is this need to believe that Americans were the true conquerors of the North American continent; it is all there in Manifest Destiny, in the hype about the May Flower, and in the ethos of Independence Day. Embedded in the subconscious of American history is this idea of American civilization, which conquers the uncivilized. Although the idea of identifying a group as “barbaric” is antiquated (or at least in the anthropological academic world), there is still this underlying notion that the indigenous populations were not as civilized, so they don't count in this historic battle for the land between the Atlantic and Pacific. Even though they were here first.

Native Americans, I propose, have a much larger impact on American history than American history lets on. Native American history has the potential to shake the foundation of traditional American history, so it is pushed to the side and ignored.

11:32 PM  
Blogger TJE said...

Another lik with more info:

http://www.hudsonriver.com/gazette/indians.htm

8:07 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home